{ "meta": { "schemaVersion": 1, "documentType": "personal_autonomy_index_assessment_spec", "title": "Personal Autonomy Index", "description": "Structured description of questionnaire content, scoring, and tier labels for external simulation and tooling. Question text is the authoritative copy from the application source.", "generatedAtUtc": "2026-05-19T16:53:15.872260Z" }, "questionCount": 25, "categoryCount": 6, "categories": [ { "index": 0, "labelJa": "防御力：物理的・経済的独立性", "labelEn": "Resilience: physical & economic independence", "labelZh": "韧性：身体与经济的独立性" }, { "index": 1, "labelJa": "流動性：社会的機動性", "labelEn": "Mobility: social & geographic flexibility", "labelZh": "流动性：社会与地理的灵活度" }, { "index": 2, "labelJa": "実行力：リソース運用能力", "labelEn": "Execution: resource & operations", "labelZh": "执行力：资源与运营" }, { "index": 3, "labelJa": "変換力：価値基準の自己決定", "labelEn": "Value-Conversion", "labelZh": "转化力：价值的自我定义" }, { "index": 4, "labelJa": "自律性：時間と動機の自己統治", "labelEn": "Autonomy: time & motivation", "labelZh": "自主性：时间与动机" }, { "index": 5, "labelJa": "自己創造：能動的構築力", "labelEn": "Self-authorship: building & creating", "labelZh": "自我创造：主动构建" } ], "questionCategoryOrder": [ 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 2, 0 ], "scoring": { "choicePoints": { "A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "N_A": 0 }, "naExcludedFromIndex": true, "naApplicabilityPolicy": "N/A is reserved for objective non-applicability only (the premise of the question does not apply, e.g. no such contract, role, or household). It must not be used as a generic skip for uncertainty, discomfort, or refusal; use A/B/C or redesign the item. See project spec §5.1.1.", "nullOrUnansweredExcluded": true, "personalAutonomyIndex": { "description": "Index from 0 to 100 from valid A/B/C answers only. Higher means more freedom in this instrument's definition.", "formula": "index = round( clamp( 0, 100, (S / (2 * n)) * 100 ) )", "variables": { "S": "Sum of choice points (A=2, B=1, C=0) over valid answers.", "n": "Count of valid answers (excludes N/A and null/unanswered)." }, "whenNIsZero": { "index": 0, "note": "If there are no valid answers, the index is defined as 0." }, "equivalentWhenAllAnswered": "When all n questions are valid, index = round((S / (2*n)) * 100)." } }, "personalAutonomyIndexTiers": [ { "level": 1, "minIndexInclusive": 0, "maxIndexInclusive": 44, "labelEn": "C: System-Integrated", "labelJa": "C: System-Integrated（システム統合）" }, { "level": 2, "minIndexInclusive": 45, "maxIndexInclusive": 64, "labelEn": "B: Partially Constrained", "labelJa": "B: Partially Constrained（部分的制約）" }, { "level": 3, "minIndexInclusive": 65, "maxIndexInclusive": 79, "labelEn": "A: Autonomous", "labelJa": "A: Autonomous（自律的）" }, { "level": 4, "minIndexInclusive": 80, "maxIndexInclusive": 100, "labelEn": "S: Independent", "labelJa": "S: Independent（完全独立）" } ], "demographicsProfileFields": [ { "field": "ageBand", "apiQueryKey": "AgeBand", "description": "Ordinal age band (cohort gate and optional analytics)." }, { "field": "gender", "apiQueryKey": "Gender", "description": "Gender (analytics)." }, { "field": "countryAlpha2", "apiQueryKey": "Country", "description": "ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 residence; may be mapped to macro region when data is sparse." }, { "field": "familyStructure", "apiQueryKey": "Family", "description": "Family structure (cohort gate)." }, { "field": "employmentType", "apiQueryKey": "Employment", "description": "Employment type (cohort gate)." } ], "questionsByLocale": { "ja": [ { "id": 1, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "月々の手取り収入に対する「固定支出」の割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "家賃、食費、各種ローン、返済、医療保険、学費、仕送り、介護、水道光熱、通信費、その他", "optionA": "30%未満", "optionB": "30%〜50%", "optionC": "50%以上", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学・稀缺性（scarcity）：金融ストレスと認知資源の圧迫。【参照】欧州統計の住宅費負担率は可処分所得の40%超を住宅費が占む状態を定義する。本設問は住宅に限らず固定支出全体へ広げ、先進国の生活コスト圧迫帯の参考線として読む。【運用】30%未満／30〜50%／50%以上を比較可能性のための三区分とする。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 2, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "親、子ども、配偶者などの立場から、家庭内の作業に1日平均で何時間費やしていますか？", "sample": "家事、育児、介護、通院（自分または家族）、ペットの世話、その他", "optionA": "1時間未満", "optionB": "1〜4時間", "optionC": "4時間以上", "annotation": "【理論】ケア・エコノミー・労働経済学：無償ケアと有償労働・余暇のトレードオフ、時間的貧困。【参照】国際時間利用統計は無償労働・ケア時間を日次で比較する。本設問の定義は統計表と完全一致しないが、数時間単位の差が生活余力を左右する。【運用】1時間未満／1〜4時間／4時間以上を先進国の時間利用分布を踏まえた三区分とする。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 3, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "急に収入がゼロになった場合、いまの生活をどれくらい維持できますか？", "sample": "現金、普通預金、すぐ現金化できる金融資産（すぐに処分できない不動産などの資産は除く）、その他", "optionA": "6ヶ月以上", "optionB": "3ヶ月以上〜6ヶ月未満", "optionC": "3ヶ月未満", "annotation": "【理論】マクロ家計・労働経済学：予備的貯蓄（precautionary saving）、ジョブ・サーチ理論。【参照】先進国の家計調査は数か月分の流動資産をバッファ指標として把握する。FP実務でも3〜6か月分が生活防衛資金の目安。【運用】6か月以上／3〜6か月未満／3か月未満。長いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 4, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "平日を基準に、1日のうち自分の好きなことに使える時間はどれくらいありますか？", "sample": "趣味、勉強、運動、雑談など（仕事、家事、育児、介護、睡眠、食事、入浴等を除く）、その他", "optionA": "4時間以上", "optionB": "2時間以上〜4時間未満", "optionC": "2時間未満", "annotation": "【理論】時間利用社会学・福祉経済学：裁量時間（discretionary time）。【参照】公開タイムユース統計の余暇・自己使用時間は就業・育児で変動；就業者の中央値帯はおおむね2〜4時間/日。本設問「好きなこと」と学術定義は非同一。【運用】平日基準で4時間以上／2時間以上〜4時間未満／2時間未満。id:2と表裏。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 5, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "いまの住まいから、他の地域や国へ移るのに必要な準備期間はどのくらいですか？", "sample": "退職・引き継ぎ、賃貸解約、不動産売却、家族の転校、医療の切り替え、その他", "optionA": "1ヶ月以内", "optionB": "1〜3ヶ月", "optionC": "3ヶ月超、または事実上極めて困難", "annotation": "【理論】地域・都市経済学：居住地選択（タイボート型）、移動摩擦、実質的自由。【参照】先進国の雇用・賃貸・学校調整では通知・準備が数週間〜数か月に分布しやすいが、一意の学術閾値はない。【運用】1ヶ月以内／1〜3ヶ月／3ヶ月超または事実上困難。短いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 6, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "いま結んでいる主要な契約を、トラブルなく終了するまで、最短でどのくらいかかりますか？", "sample": "雇用、賃貸、事業契約、保険、その他", "optionA": "1ヶ月以内", "optionB": "2〜3ヶ月", "optionC": "4ヶ月以上", "annotation": "【理論】取引コスト経済学：契約ロックイン、離脱コスト（exit cost）、取引固有資産。【参照】雇用・賃貸・年契約では1〜3か月の通知・解約猶予が実務上多い。【運用】1ヶ月以内／2〜3ヶ月／4か月以上。短いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 7, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "「組織名、血縁、学歴、資格」などの書類上の肩書きを使わずに、個人の「純粋なスキルや発信力」でどれくらい稼いでいますか", "sample": "SNS/ブログ発信、創作（執筆/音楽/芸術等)、技術（語学/撮影/調理/プログラミング等）、特許/印税、その他", "optionA": "50%以上", "optionB": "10%〜49%", "optionC": "10%未満", "annotation": "【理論】労働・人的資本経済学：一般的人力資本、収入源の可搬性。【参照】複数収入源を持ち本業依存が残る層が厚いとの仮読みから10〜49%をミドル帯とする。【運用】50%以上／10〜49%／10%未満。高いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 8, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "住所や仕事を自由に選べない原因になっている、次のような制約はいくつありますか？", "sample": "就労ビザ、在留資格、軍務、公職、保護観察、執行猶予、出国禁止命令、条件付きの奨学金、助成金、伝統的・宗教的な居住区制限、その他", "optionA": "0個（ほぼ自由）", "optionB": "1個（手続きはあるが可能）", "optionC": "2個以上（事実上困難）", "annotation": "【理論】公共行政学：行政負担（administrative burden）、制度的制約の重複。【参照】制度的条項の重複は実質的移動・転職の障壁として議論される。【運用】0個／1個／2個以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 9, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "家事など、生活を維持する作業のうち、自動化や外部サービスに任せている割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "家事代行、ロボット掃除機、食洗機、乾燥機、介護、保育、シッター、フードデリバリー、クリーニング、ネットスーパー、秘書、執事、シェフ、運転手、税務、その他", "optionA": "80%以上", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "30%未満", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学・時間の購入：時間の外部化とウェルビーイング。【参照】完全外注と完全自担の中間層が厚いとの運用読み。所得等で利用困難は環境要因。【運用】80%以上／30〜79%／30%未満。高いほど自由度が高い側（能力の判定ではない）。" }, { "id": 10, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "過去1年間、健康上の理由で「予定していた活動」をキャンセルまたは大きく変更した日は、合計で何日ありましたか？", "sample": "仕事、通院、運動、旅行、趣味の予定など、その他", "optionA": "0日", "optionB": "1〜5日", "optionC": "6日以上", "annotation": "【理論】公衆衛生・健康関連QOL：活動制限日数、生活機能。【参照】NHIS（National Health Interview Survey）などの年次健康指標は、健康上の理由による活動制限・欠勤等を合計日数で把握する。本設問は診断ではなく、予定遂行の年間インパクトを測る。【運用】0日／1〜5日／6日以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 11, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "集中したい時間帯に、すぐに反応が必要な割り込みは、平均して1時間に何回ありますか？（仕事中も含む）", "sample": "家族の呼び出し、チャット、電話、来客など、その他", "optionA": "1回以下", "optionB": "2〜3回", "optionC": "4回以上", "annotation": "【理論】認知科学・HCI：割り込み（interruption）、タスク再開コスト。【参照】Gloria Markらの中断研究では、割り込み後に元の作業へ戻るまで平均約23分を要するとされる。1時間に4回なら23分×4回=92分となり、60分枠を超えるため「4回以上」を高拘束帯に置く。【運用】1回以下／2〜3回／4回以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 12, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "通信・移動・決済など、生活や仕事で欠かせない手段について、使えなくなったときすぐ代わりを用意できるものはどれくらいありますか？", "sample": "パソコン、インターネット、スマートフォン、SNSアカウント、医療、車、船、現金、特定工具、調理器具、撮影機材、楽器、その他", "optionA": "すべてにおいて、すぐに使える代替手段がある", "optionB": "代替手段があるものと、ないものが混在している", "optionC": "1つでも壊れたら日常のオペレーションが完全に停止するものが含まれる", "annotation": "【理論】信頼性工学・組織論：システム冗長性、単一障害点（SPOF）、高信頼組織。【参照】直列要素が1つでもあればシステム稼働は脆弱化するという工学定義。【運用】すべて代替可／混在／1つでも日常オペ停止。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 13, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "大きな買い物（月収の1割超）や重要な契約で、24時間以上考えてから決めることは、どのくらいありますか？", "sample": "家電、車、パソコン・スマホ、家具、不動産、投資・ローン、転職・退職、賃貸・住宅ローン、保険、通信、起業・事業契約、その他", "optionA": "ほとんどいつも（9割以上）", "optionB": "ときどき（約5〜9割）", "optionC": "ほとんどない（5割未満）", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学・認知心理学：二重過程理論、熟慮と衝動的判断。【参照】24時間ルールは啓発的運用であり学術必須値ではない。【運用】9割以上／5〜9割／5割未満。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 14, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "これまでに、やめたい習慣を自分の努力で4週間以上続けてやめられた回数は？", "sample": "禁煙、禁酒、SNS、ゲーム、ギャンブル、スマホ依存、動画視聴、ダイエット、散財、成人向けコンテンツ、不健全な人間関係、その他", "optionA": "2回以上（別の習慣・別の時期を含む）", "optionB": "1回だけ", "optionC": "一度もない", "annotation": "【理論】社会認知・習慣科学：自己効力感、習慣変更・行動変容。【参照】禁断・行動変容で4週間以上の維持は効果判定の慣行窓。2回以上で状況依存の弱みを弁別。医療レベルの依存症診断は対象外。【運用】2回以上／1回／なし。該当習慣なしは能力否定ではない。" }, { "id": 15, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "重要な決定をするとき、誰かの許可が必要だと感じる割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "職業、学業、転職、離職、住居、高額決済、結婚/離婚/交際、妊娠/出産、起業、その他", "optionA": "10%未満", "optionB": "10%〜50%", "optionC": "51%以上", "annotation": "【理論】動機づけ心理学：自己決定理論（SDT）、エージェンシー（行為主体性）。【参照】「許可が必要」と感じる割合は実権と別の体感指標。【運用】10%未満／10〜50%／51%以上。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 16, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "精神的・時間的・経済的な搾取や悪影響を与えている人物との関係を、あなたは自らの意思で遮断・離脱できますか？", "sample": "モラルハラスメント、搾取的な関係、縁切り、主体的孤立、連絡先ブロック、洗脳、マインドコントロール、その他", "optionA": "該当する関係がない、またはほぼいつも遮断・離脱できる", "optionB": "一部の関係だけ／ときどきできる", "optionC": "ほとんどできない（やめたい関係が残っている）", "annotation": "【理論】家族社会学・社会心理学：関係からの離脱コスト、境界設定、行使的コントロール（coercive control）。【参照】職場・親密関係・コミュニティにおける搾取・ハラスメントの離脱は、法的・経済的・規範的障壁を伴う。本設問は診断や法的判断ではなく、離脱・遮断の自己申告可能性。【運用】該当なしまたはほぼいつも可／一部・ときどき／ほとんど不可。id:7は収入の肩書き非依存、id:18は物・事業の損切り。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 17, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "報酬や評価をほとんど期待せずに、純粋に自分が楽しいと感じるものに、週に何時間使っていますか？", "sample": "未発表の研究、創作（日記/絵/作曲等）、ヨガ/瞑想/ジョギング/筋トレ、手仕事（DIY/植物/料理）、匿名奉仕、その他", "optionA": "5時間以上", "optionB": "1〜4時間", "optionC": "1時間未満", "annotation": "【理論】動機づけ心理学：自己決定理論、内発的動機づけ。【参照】余暇構成と完全には一致しない。【運用】週5時間以上／1〜4時間／1時間未満。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 18, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "多くのお金や時間を費やしたものを、未練が残りながら、放置ではなく自らの意思で明確に終了や処分をしたことはありますか？", "sample": "赤字事業、学校、課金ゲーム、将来性のない交際、成果のない習い事、未完の創作物、資格や語学の勉強、含み損の大きい投資、使っていないブランド物、問題のある身内、その他", "optionA": "2つ以上／今は終了すべきものがない", "optionB": "1つだけ／ほかに残っている", "optionC": "一度も実行できていない", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学・組織論：埋没費、エスカレーション、戦略的撤退（損切り）。【参照】損切りの自己申告は実行機能・戦略撤退の近似。【運用】2つ以上または該当なし／1つまたは残存／一度も不可。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 19, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "肉体的または頭脳的な負荷を伴う「自発的な」トレーニングや勉強を、週に何日続けていますか？", "sample": "筋力トレーニング、ランニング、武術、舞踊/ダンス、ヨガ、瞑想、禅、楽器、勉強、創作、その他", "optionA": "週4日以上", "optionB": "週1〜3日", "optionC": "週1日未満", "annotation": "【理論】健康行動科学：実行意図、習慣形成、自己調整。【参照】公衆衛生の運動推奨は参考；規律の多さ＝自由ではない。【運用】週4日以上／1〜3日／週1日未満。" }, { "id": 20, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "最小限の義務をのぞき、職場やグループで働きかたを自分で決められる仕事や役割の割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "タスクの進め方、予算、休憩、有給休暇、優先順位、リモート可否など、その他", "optionA": "60%以上", "optionB": "20%〜59%", "optionC": "20%未満", "annotation": "【理論】産業・組織心理学：職務特性モデル、職務裁量、ジョブ・クラフティング。【参照】職務特性調査の自律性次元は尺度上過半数超が高得点帯に近い。本設問は％自己申告で標準尺度と非同一。【運用】60%以上／20〜59%／20%未満。高いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 21, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "自分で稼いだ資産のうち、使い道を自由に決められる割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "生活費、貯蓄・投資、趣味、仕送り、税金の支払い以外の用途など、その他", "optionA": "80%以上", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "30%未満", "annotation": "【理論】家計社会学：家計内資源配分、裁量キャッシュ。【参照】国際家計統計の共同プール定義とは非同一。【運用】80%以上／30〜79%／30%未満。高いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 22, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "職場やグループで、誰かが多数派や上司に反対したとき、その人が陰口・無視・評価低下などの仕打ち（報復）を受ける確率は？", "sample": "減給、降格、解雇、物理/精神的な追放、勘当、暴力や身体的拘束、訴訟、罰金など、その他", "optionA": "10%未満（事実上ペナルティなし）", "optionB": "10%〜50%（時々ペナルティがある）", "optionC": "51%以上（高確率で報復を受ける）", "annotation": "【理論】組織心理学：心理的安全性、報復恐怖、発言撤退・沈黙。【参照】心理的安全性尺度は報復確率の直接尺度ではない。【運用】報復10%未満／10〜50%／51%以上。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 23, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "あなたの無償作業（ボランティア）のうち、「仕方なくやっている」と感じる割合は？", "sample": "労働（共同体のインフラ維持・自警団）、政治動員、無償の残業や社内行事、一族による儀式、断れない寄付や供物（上納金・お布施・税）、その他", "optionA": "ほとんどない（自発的、または無償作業がほとんどない）", "optionB": "半分くらい", "optionC": "大半、またはすべて", "annotation": "【理論】動機づけ心理学：自己決定理論、外的統制と内的動機。【参照】義務的動機の割合はイベントカウントではない体感。【運用】ほとんどない／半分／大半またはすべて。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 24, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "就寝、起床の時間を、他者に合わせることなく自由に決められる日は、週にどれくらいありますか？", "sample": "フレックスタイム、リモート、早出・終電、夜勤・交代制、コアタイム、オンコール・夜間連絡、育児・介護の夜間対応、同居人の生活リズム、その他", "optionA": "週5日以上", "optionB": "週2〜4日", "optionC": "週1日以下", "annotation": "【理論】時間社会学・クロノバイオロジー：時間的自律、社会的時差（体内時計と社会時間のずれ）。【参照】就業スケジュールの裁量は就寝・起床時刻のズレを緩和しうる。本設問は睡眠の時間数・質ではなく、就寝・起床の時刻決定の主体を問う。【運用】週5日以上／2〜4日／1日以下。多いほど自由度が高い側。id:4は平日の裁量時間の量、id:11は覚醒中の割り込み、id:20は職場の働き方裁量。食事の時刻は対象外。" }, { "id": 25, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "口に入れるものについて、自分が食べたい・食べてよいと感じるものを選べている割合は、およそ何％ですか？（金銭や医学的制限で選べないものは除き、選べる範囲の中で答えてください）", "sample": "会食・接待、社食・給食、家族の献立・作り置き、制限食・病院食、ダイエット・指導者の食事ルール、SNS・流行の食トレンド、宗教上の禁忌、アレルギー対応（医学的）、その他", "optionA": "80%以上", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "30%未満", "annotation": "【理論】自己決定理論・食行動科学：食の自律的調節と外部的・統制的調節。【参照】「何を食べるか」の外部規制は食行動の統制感と関連づけられる。貧困による選択肢の狭さは環境要因であり能力判定ではない。【運用】80%以上／30〜79%／30%未満。多いほど自由度が高い側。id:24は就寝・起床の時刻。食事の時刻は本設問の対象外。" } ], "en": [ { "id": 1, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "What percentage of your take-home income goes to mandatory spending you cannot stop at will, such as debt repayments or customary remittances/donations?", "optionA": "10% or less", "optionB": "11%-30%", "optionC": "31% or more", "annotation": "Behavioral economics shows that once fixed spending exceeds about 30%, adaptability to unexpected risk drops sharply and scarcity mindset effects become more pronounced." }, { "id": 2, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "On average per day, how many hours are tied up in non-movable time commitments related to sustaining others' lives or your own treatment, such as childcare, caregiving, and medical visits?", "optionA": "Less than 1 hour", "optionB": "1-4 hours", "optionC": "4 hours or more", "annotation": "Spending 4+ hours a day on unpaid care labor physically crowds out time for self-investment and recovery, and marks a boundary of time poverty (sociology: time-poor studies)." }, { "id": 3, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "If all your current income dropped to zero, for how many months could you maintain your current standard of living using only assets (savings, physical assets, shared assets, etc.)?", "optionA": "6 months or more", "optionB": "3-5 months", "optionC": "Less than 3 months", "annotation": "A six-month reserve is a standard benchmark for both psychological safety and bargaining power in the labor market to reject unfair terms (reservation wage)." }, { "id": 4, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "Do you routinely secure private freedom: time and space where you are not monitored and do not need to report your thoughts or actions to anyone?", "optionA": "Always secured", "optionB": "Sometimes interfered with or restricted", "optionC": "Almost always monitored or required to report", "annotation": "Time and space shielded from others' evaluative gaze form a critical boundary for preserving self-concept and mental recovery (environmental psychology: boundary control)." }, { "id": 5, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "Given your current family, medical, and caregiving constraints, is it physically feasible for you to move elsewhere and rebuild your life?", "optionA": "Fully feasible", "optionB": "Feasible, but requires major preparation and coordination", "optionC": "Practically close to impossible", "annotation": "Physical mobility is a core human capability. More constraints generally mean stronger environmental lock-in and lower freedom (mobility studies)." }, { "id": 6, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "What is the shortest period needed to cancel and exit your current job or residence without legal or financial trouble?", "optionA": "Within 1 month", "optionB": "2-3 months", "optionC": "4 months or more", "annotation": "When exit takes over three months, exit costs become structurally excessive and can produce subservience to unfair environments (labor economics)." }, { "id": 7, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "Do you have a way to earn income using your own skills or assets without depending on a specific place or organization?", "optionA": "Yes (location/organization independent)", "optionB": "Yes, but with major income loss or substantial reskilling", "optionC": "No (fully dependent on current environment)", "annotation": "The portability of human capital is a key defensive wall against domination by specific places or organizations (human capital theory)." }, { "id": 8, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "In your current legal and institutional position, do you ultimately have the right to decide and change where you live and work by your own will?", "optionA": "Yes, full rights", "optionB": "Possible with constraints and adjustments", "optionC": "No institutional/structural right", "annotation": "Freedom of movement is defined in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; institutional restrictions can directly obstruct personal survival strategy." }, { "id": 9, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "On average per day, how many hours do you spend on life-maintenance tasks (housework, admin, etc.) that cannot be moved at your own discretion?", "optionA": "Less than 1 hour", "optionB": "1-2 hours", "optionC": "2 hours or more", "annotation": "Spending over two hours on routine maintenance indicates opportunity-cost loss for higher-order creative work at a level that is hard to ignore." }, { "id": 10, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "In the past 12 months, for health reasons, on how many total days did you cancel or substantially change activities you had planned?", "optionA": "0 days", "optionB": "1 to 5 days", "optionC": "6 or more days", "annotation": "[Theory] Public health & health-related QOL: activity-limitation days and functioning. [Ref] Annual health indicators such as NHIS track total days of activity limitation or work/school loss due to health. This item is not diagnostic; it measures annual impact on planned activity. [Ops] 0 / 1-5 / 6+ days; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 11, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "During periods when you want to focus, how many interruptions requiring an immediate response occur on average per hour? (Including work time.)", "optionA": "1 or fewer", "optionB": "2 to 3", "optionC": "4 or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Cognitive science & HCI: interruptions and task-resumption cost. [Ref] Gloria Mark and colleagues report that returning to the original task after an interruption takes about 23 minutes on average. Four interruptions in one hour imply 23 min x 4 = 92 min, exceeding a 60-minute block, so 4+ is the high-constraint band. [Ops] <=1 / 2-3 / 4+ per hour; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 12, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "If your primary communication channel is cut off, to what extent can you maintain continuity in life and work (through alternatives or offline fallback)?", "optionA": "Can continue with alternatives", "optionB": "Some disruption occurs", "optionC": "Stops completely", "annotation": "Information redundancy is the opposite of fragility. Complete dependence on a single system means external disruption can become a direct survival risk (resilience engineering)." }, { "id": 13, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "For high-value contracts or purchases worth over 10% of monthly income, how often do you decide within 24 hours without objective comparison?", "optionA": "Under 10% (mostly calm and deliberate)", "optionB": "10%-50%", "optionC": "51% or more", "annotation": "In high-value decisions, instant-decision frequency indicates how often impulsive processing (System 1) overrides analytical processing (System 2), i.e., susceptibility to cognitive hijacking." }, { "id": 14, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "In the last 30 days, on how many days did you voluntarily study unknown fields unrelated to your current role or income?", "optionA": "12+ days (about 3 days/week)", "optionB": "4-11 days", "optionC": "3 days or fewer", "annotation": "Exploring the unknown is a marker of adaptive autonomy. Learning something new at least three times per week helps preserve option value and prevents over-optimization to existing structures." }, { "id": 15, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "In major life decisions, regardless of others' opinions, how strongly do you feel that you are choosing based on your own genuine conviction?", "optionA": "Always a strong sense of conviction", "optionB": "Some conviction, but frequent compromise", "optionC": "Others' demands usually prevail", "annotation": "In self-determination theory, felt conviction is among the highest indicators of fulfillment. Decisions without it imply psychological subservience." }, { "id": 16, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "If your titles, status, career history, and academic credentials all stopped carrying weight tomorrow, would you feel anxious about rebuilding trust based only on your personal ability?", "optionA": "Almost no anxiety", "optionB": "Some anxiety", "optionC": "Very anxious (hard to imagine)", "annotation": "Low dependence on external labels indicates that self-concept is rooted in intrinsic values and reflects genuine autonomy (self-concept clarity)." }, { "id": 17, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "Have you sustained any activity for at least three months based solely on your own curiosity, without pursuing evaluation or reward?", "optionA": "Yes, and still ongoing", "optionB": "Used to, but currently paused", "optionC": "No such activity", "annotation": "A period of three months or more is a practical benchmark for whether intrinsic motivation has formed without external rewards." }, { "id": 18, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "Do you find yourself prioritizing irrational status-quo maintenance because past time or effort would feel wasted?", "optionA": "Almost never", "optionB": "Sometimes, but limited", "optionC": "It dominates major parts of life", "annotation": "The ability to avoid the sunk-cost effect is directly linked to rational thinking needed to break free from the greatest internal constraint: one's past self." }, { "id": 19, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "In the last 30 days, on how many days did you voluntarily impose meaningful physical or mental load on yourself (e.g., training), without external coercion?", "optionA": "20 days or more", "optionB": "5-19 days", "optionC": "4 days or fewer", "annotation": "Maintaining self-initiated discipline for 20+ days per month suggests a very high level of impulse control associated with prefrontal regulation (self-efficacy)." }, { "id": 20, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "Within your group, do you feel psychologically free to express your views and adjust or choose your roles?", "optionA": "Yes, I can voluntarily choose and adjust roles", "optionB": "Partly possible, but often fixed", "optionC": "Roles are imposed on me", "annotation": "Having agency to adjust one's role within a group is central to preserving dignity and autonomy in relationships." }, { "id": 21, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "To what extent do you have decision authority to use the assets you earned (investment or spending) without needing others' permission?", "optionA": "Fully decided by my own judgment", "optionB": "Requires some consultation or approval", "optionC": "Others hold the real power", "annotation": "Lacking final authority over economic resources is a major structural driver of lost voice and psychological subservience within groups (empowerment theory)." }, { "id": 22, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "When expressing opinions that differ from surrounding norms, do you have enough psychological safety to do so without fearing isolation or punishment?", "optionA": "Strongly yes (I feel safe)", "optionB": "Some anxiety, but I can still speak", "optionC": "Speaking up leads to disadvantages", "annotation": "Guaranteeing the right to voice dissent under conformity pressure protects individuals from groupthink and sustains the social autonomy needed for real diversity." }, { "id": 23, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "When acting for family or group, do you feel fulfillment as part of your identity rather than one-sided self-sacrifice?", "optionA": "Strongly yes (fulfilling)", "optionB": "Sometimes", "optionC": "Rarely (mostly duty)", "annotation": "In relational autonomy theory, contribution aligned with one's own values is an essential condition for feeling a high degree of freedom while remaining in community." }, { "id": 24, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "How many days per week can you freely choose your bedtime and wake time without having to align with others (work, school, family expectations)?", "sample": "Flextime, remote work, early/late shifts, night rotation, core hours, on-call or after-hours messages, overnight childcare or caregiving, housemates' routines, other", "optionA": "5 or more days per week", "optionB": "2 to 4 days per week", "optionC": "1 or fewer days per week", "annotation": "[Theory] Sociology of time & chronobiology: temporal autonomy, social jetlag (misalignment of biological vs social clocks). [Ref] Work schedule control can reduce timing strain. This item asks who controls bedtime/wake time, not sleep duration or quality. [Ops] 5+ / 2–4 / ≤1 days; more is higher freedom. Distinct from discretionary leisure time (id 4), interruptions while awake (id 11), and job discretion % (id 20). Meal timing is out of scope." }, { "id": 25, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "Of what you eat, roughly what share feels like food you genuinely want to eat and feel okay eating? (Exclude what you cannot choose for money or medical reasons; answer within what you could choose.)", "sample": "Work dinners, company or school meals, family menus or leftovers, prescribed diets, influencer or diet rules, religious rules, allergy-safe substitutions, other", "optionA": "80% or more", "optionB": "30% to 79%", "optionC": "Less than 30%", "annotation": "[Theory] Self-determination theory & eating behavior: autonomous vs controlled regulation of eating. [Ref] External food rules relate to controlled eating. Poverty narrowing choice is an environmental factor, not a personal-ability judgment. [Ops] 80%+ / 30–79% / <30%; higher is more freedom. id 24 is sleep-wake timing; this item is food choice, not meal schedule." } ], "zh": [ { "id": 1, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "在实得收入中，有多少比例用于你无法凭个人意愿停止的「硬性支出」（例如还贷、习惯性的汇款/捐赠等）？", "optionA": "10%及以下", "optionB": "11%–30%", "optionC": "31%及以上", "annotation": "行为经济学研究表明，当固定支出占比超过约 30% 时，面对意外风险的调适能力会明显下降，「稀缺心态」效应更易显现。" }, { "id": 2, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "因育儿、照护家人、就医等维系他人生命或自身治疗而产生的「不可挪动时间」，平均每天大约有多少小时？", "optionA": "少于 1 小时", "optionB": "1–4 小时", "optionC": "4 小时及以上", "annotation": "每日 4 小时以上的无偿照护劳动，往往在物理上挤占自我投资与恢复时间，并成为「时间贫困」的社会学边界线之一。" }, { "id": 3, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "如果当前收入立刻归零，仅靠维持现有「生活水平」的资产（存款、实物、共同财产等），你大约能支撑几个月？", "optionA": "6 个月及以上", "optionB": "3–5 个月", "optionC": "不足 3 个月", "annotation": "六个月储备常被视为心理安全感与在劳动市场中拒绝不公平条款的谈判力（保留工资）的常见基准。" }, { "id": 4, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "你是否能稳定拥有「私人自由」：在日常中拥有不被监视、也无需向任何人汇报想法与行动的时间与空间？", "optionA": "基本总能保障", "optionB": "有时会受干扰或受限", "optionC": "几乎总在监视下或负有汇报义务", "annotation": "能暂时脱离他人评价轴线的时空，是维持自我概念与精神恢复的重要边界（环境心理学：边界控制）。" }, { "id": 5, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "在考虑当前家庭、医疗、照护等约束后，你是否仍具备在物理上迁往他处并重建生活的现实可能？", "optionA": "完全可行", "optionB": "可行，但需要大量准备与协调", "optionC": "实质上接近不可能", "annotation": "物理可迁徙性是个人可行能力（capabilities）的重要组成部分；约束越多通常意味着更深的「环境黏性」。（迁移研究）" }, { "id": 6, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "要在没有法律或经济纠纷的前提下结束当前工作或住所契约，从你决定到完成，最短需要多久？", "optionA": "1 个月以内", "optionB": "2–3 个月", "optionC": "4 个月及以上", "annotation": "当退出耗时超过三个月，退出成本往往在结构上过高，并可能助长对不公平处境的依附（劳动经济学）。" }, { "id": 7, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "你是否拥有一种不靠特定地点或组织、仅凭技能与资产就能获得收入的途径？", "optionA": "有（可不依赖场所/组织）", "optionB": "有，但往往伴随明显的收入下滑或大规模再学习", "optionC": "没有（高度依赖现有环境）", "annotation": "人力资本的可携带性（portability），是个人摆脱特定场所与组织支配的重要屏障（人力资本理论）。" }, { "id": 8, "categoryIndex": 1, "prompt": "以你当前的法律与制度处境，你是否在最终意义上拥有凭自己意志决定或变更居住地与工作的权利？", "optionA": "拥有完整权利", "optionB": "可以做到，但需要条件与调适", "optionC": "在制度/结构上不具备相应权利", "annotation": "迁徙自由在《世界人权宣言》第 13 条亦有体现；制度性约束会直接阻碍个人的生存与发展策略。" }, { "id": 9, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "为维持日常生活，你每天平均有多少小时花在无法按自己裁量挪动的「维持性劳动」（家务、行政事务等）上？", "optionA": "少于 1 小时", "optionB": "1–2 小时", "optionC": "2 小时及以上", "annotation": "当例行维持超过两小时，往往意味着高阶创造性活动面临不可忽视的机会成本损失。" }, { "id": 10, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "过去 1 年里，因健康原因取消或大幅改变原定活动的日子，合计有多少天？", "optionA": "0 天", "optionB": "1〜5 天", "optionC": "6 天及以上", "annotation": "【理论】公共卫生与健康相关生活质量：活动受限天数与生活功能。【参照】NHIS 等年度健康指标会统计因健康原因导致的活动受限、缺勤等合计天数。本题不是诊断，而是衡量一年中计划执行受到的影响。【运用】0天／1〜5天／6天以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 11, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "在你想集中注意力的时段，平均每小时会有多少次需要立即回应的打断？（包括工作中）", "optionA": "1 次及以下", "optionB": "2〜3 次", "optionC": "4 次及以上", "annotation": "【理论】认知科学与 HCI：打断、任务恢复成本。【参照】Gloria Mark 等人的中断研究指出，被打断后回到原任务平均约需 23 分钟。若每小时 4 次，则 23 分钟 × 4 次 = 92 分钟，超过 60 分钟，因此将「4次及以上」设为高约束区间。【运用】1次以下／2〜3次／4次以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 12, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "当你的主要通信渠道被切断时，你在多大程度上仍能维持生活与工作的连续性（是否有替代手段或离线预案）？", "optionA": "有替代方案，可继续", "optionB": "会出现一定障碍", "optionC": "基本完全停摆", "annotation": "信息冗余是脆弱性的反面；对单一系统完全依赖意味着外部中断可能直接威胁个人生存链条（韧性工程）。" }, { "id": 13, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "对占月收入 10% 以上的高额合同或购买，你有多常在未做客观比较的情况下 24 小时内「当场拍板」？", "optionA": "低于 10%（多数时候冷静决策）", "optionB": "10%–50%", "optionC": "51% 及以上", "annotation": "在高额决策中，冲动式快速决策频率反映「系统 1」覆盖「系统 2」的程度，即认知被「劫持」的易感度。" }, { "id": 14, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "过去 30 天里，有多少天你出于自愿，学习与当前岗位或收入无直接关系的「未知领域」？", "optionA": "12 天及以上（约每周 3 天）", "optionB": "4–11 天", "optionC": "3 天及以下", "annotation": "探索未知是「适应性自主」的指标；较高频率的新学习有助于保留选择权，避免过度嵌入既有结构。" }, { "id": 15, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "在人生重大决定上，无论他人意见如何，你有多强地感到自己是基于「真正认同」在做最终选择？", "optionA": "始终有很强的一致感", "optionB": "有认同，但妥协也很多", "optionC": "更多是他人要求占上风", "annotation": "在自我决定理论中，「感到一致/认同」是高度满足指标之一；缺乏它往往意味着心理上的从属感。" }, { "id": 16, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "若明天起你的头衔、地位、履历与学历都不再被认可，仅凭借个人能力重建信任，你会感到焦虑吗？", "optionA": "几乎不焦虑", "optionB": "有些焦虑", "optionC": "非常焦虑（难以想象）", "annotation": "对外在标签依赖较低，往往意味着自我概念更扎根于内在价值，并体现更高水平的真实自主（自我概念清晰性）。" }, { "id": 17, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "你是否曾连续至少三个月，仅出于好奇心、而非为了评价或报酬而持续某项活动？", "optionA": "有，且仍在进行", "optionB": "曾经有，目前暂停", "optionC": "没有这样的活动", "annotation": "三个月以上的持续，是判断「无外部报酬也能维持内在动机」是否成形的一个实践性时间尺度。" }, { "id": 18, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "你是否会因为「已经投入的时间与努力太可惜」而更倾向于维持并不合理的现状？", "optionA": "几乎不会", "optionB": "会，但范围有限", "optionC": "在生活的主要部分被其主导", "annotation": "摆脱沉没成本效应的能力，与突破「过去的自己」这一最大内在约束所需的理性思考密切相关。" }, { "id": 19, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "过去 30 天里，有多少天你在无外部强迫的情况下，主动对自己身心施加有意义的负荷（如训练等）？", "optionA": "20 天及以上", "optionB": "5–19 天", "optionC": "4 天及以下", "annotation": "每月 20 天以上的自发纪律维持，往往对应较高水平的冲动控制与前额叶调节能力（自我效能相关）。" }, { "id": 20, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "在所属群体中，你是否感到能自由表达观点，并在心理上拥有「调整/选择角色」的空间？", "optionA": "可以主动选择与调整", "optionB": "一定程度上可以，但固化也很多", "optionC": "角色多被强加", "annotation": "在群体中保留调整角色的能动空间，是关系里维护尊严与自主的核心之一。" }, { "id": 21, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "对你自己挣得的资产，你能在多大程度上无需他人许可、仅凭自己判断进行运用（投资/消费）？", "optionA": "完全由我自己决定", "optionB": "需要一定协商或批准", "optionC": "他人掌握实质决定权", "annotation": "缺乏经济资源的最终决定权，往往会在结构上削弱话语权并加深心理从属（赋权理论）。" }, { "id": 22, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "当你表达与周围常识不同的观点时，你是否拥有足够的心理安全感，而不必害怕孤立或惩罚？", "optionA": "很强（感到安全）", "optionB": "有些不安，但仍能表达", "optionC": "一旦表达就会不利", "annotation": "在同侪压力下保障「异议表达」的权利，有助于抵御群体思维并维持社会层面的自主与真实多元。" }, { "id": 23, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "当你为家庭或集体行动时，那更像单向牺牲，还是更像与你自我认同相一致的、带来充实感的选择？", "optionA": "很强（感到充实与一致）", "optionB": "有时能感到", "optionC": "很少（多为义务感）", "annotation": "在关系自主理论中，与他人贡献相一致的自我价值对齐，是在共同体中仍感到高度自由的常见必要条件。" }, { "id": 24, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "每周有多少天，你可以在不必迁就他人的情况下，自由决定就寝和起床时间？（工作、学业、家庭安排等）", "sample": "弹性工时、远程、早晚班与末班、轮班与核心时段、值班与夜间联系、夜间育儿或照护、同住者作息、其他", "optionA": "每周5天及以上", "optionB": "每周2〜4天", "optionC": "每周1天及以下", "annotation": "【理论】时间社会学与昼夜节律：时间自主、社会性时差。【参照】工作时间的可控度可能缓解作息错位。本题问的是谁决定入睡/起床时刻，而非睡眠时长或质量。【运用】5天以上／2〜4天／1天以下；越多越偏自由。与平日可支配时间量（题4）、清醒时被打断（题11）、职场裁量比例（题20）区分。不含用餐时刻。" }, { "id": 25, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "在你能选择的范围内，你觉得自己「想吃且也觉得可以吃」的食物，大约占多大比例？（请排除因经济或医学原因无法选择的选项。）", "sample": "应酬、食堂或配餐、家庭便当与剩菜、医嘱饮食、减肥或教练规则、网络饮食潮流、宗教禁忌、过敏替代餐、其他", "optionA": "80%及以上", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "30%以下", "annotation": "【理论】自我决定理论与进食行为：自主调节与外部控制。【参照】外部进食规则与受控进食相关。贫困压缩选择属于环境因素，不作能力评判。【运用】80%以上／30〜79%／30%以下；题24为就寝起床时刻；本题不问用餐时刻。" } ] }, "assessmentFlowByLocale": { "ja": "画面上の流れ：イントロ → コホート属性（任意項目を含む）→ 全25問（各問で A / B / C）→ Personal Autonomy Index（0〜100）とティア（C/B/A/S）および解説の結果画面。設問の権威ある全文（日本語・英語・中国語〈簡体字〉）は questionsByLocale に含まれる。その他の UI 言語ではアプリは英語設問を使用するため、外部検証は en 列を参照。", "en": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "zh": "界面流程：引导 → 人群属性（含可选字段）→ 共 25 题（每题选 A / B / C）→ 结果页给出Personal Autonomy Index（0–100）、等级（C/B/A/S）及解读。日语、英语、简体中文的权威题干与选项全文见 questionsByLocale；其余界面语言使用英语题库，外部核对请以 en 为准。", "es": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "fr": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "ar": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "hi": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "pt": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "ru": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks.", "ko": "On-screen flow: Intro → cohort demographics (optional fields) → 25 questions (each A, B, or C) → results with Personal Autonomy Index (0–100), tier (C/B/A/S), and interpretation. Authoritative question copy for Japanese, English, and Simplified Chinese is under questionsByLocale; other UI locales use the English question bank — use en for external checks." }, "notesForExternalUse": [ "N/A policy (strict): only when the question objectively does not apply to the respondent; see scoring.naApplicabilityPolicy and project spec §5.1.1.", "Simulation personas (e.g. “urban US office worker with children”) are not defined in this file; map them to A/B/C per question using the prompts and annotations.", "The running app may use additional UI strings not listed here.", "Schema version increments when breaking changes are made to shape or meaning of fields.", "Release builds produced by scripts/build_web_release.sh inline this document into the served index.html as